Why EUDR Compliance Needs Field Verification
Satellite data alone can't clear the negligible risk bar. How ground verification closes the gap between a model and an audit.
Read the article →Satellite data and AI outputs are predictions, not proof. I verify them on the ground, so your EUDR due diligence, CSRD disclosures and carbon market MRV hold up when a regulator or auditor pushes back.
Three places where a model that looks right on screen becomes a liability on paper, and where field verification closes the gap.
Operators and traders must prove their commodities are deforestation free. Satellite false positives block legitimate shipments; false negatives turn into legal liability.
Nature and biodiversity reporting faces external assurance. Model only or vague evidence invites qualified opinions and costly restatements.
Registries and buyers increasingly reject MRV that can't be ground truthed. A rejected credit is stranded cost and reputational exposure.
I do both, and I translate the gap into verified intelligence your organization can defend.
A clear, three step engagement, so you know exactly what you're buying before we start.
We map your exact regulatory surface, EUDR, CSRD ESRS E4, EU Taxonomy, carbon market rules, and pinpoint where your current data is weakest.
Remote sensing (Sentinel 2, Landsat, Google Earth Engine) and drone survey, cross checked against field ground truth and independent AI output evaluation.
Audit ready evidence, a documented verification protocol, and the defensible record an auditor, registry or regulator will ask to see.
From AI model evaluation to field verified compliance, every service is built on ground truth credibility.
Satellite classifications and LLM outputs are probabilistic. I quantify their uncertainty instead of hiding it, and I don't sell guarantees I can't ground truth. That candour is exactly what survives scrutiny from an auditor, a registry, or a compliance board.
Analysis from the ground and the satellite: EUDR, forest governance, remote sensing and carbon.
Satellite data alone can't clear the negligible risk bar. How ground verification closes the gap between a model and an audit.
Read the article →An Earth Engine workflow deriving catchment pressure variables for a 444 km² chalk stream catchment. Script and data included.
Read the analysis →Deforestation drivers across two major tropical forest regions, drawn from 56 peer reviewed and institutional sources.
Read the summary →What the data shows about restoration and monitoring on a former lignite landscape in North Rhine Westphalia.
Read the article →MSc research on bottom up, constitutionality based forest governance in South West Cameroon.
Read the summary →